PrepTest 144, Section 3, Question 12

ParadoxDifficulty2 of 5
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 144

In a study of tropical forests it was(49 more words not shown)

Which one of the following,(23 more words not shown)

Reading the argument

Why do the rare trees live longer, even when the species change?

The most common species reproducing the most makes sense as a pattern: producing lots of new trees could help make a species common. The puzzling part is longevity. Whichever species is rarest in a forest tends to survive longer.

What we’re looking for

Maybe the rarer trees are somehow sturdier. That's only a guess, and we'd still need to explain why the pattern follows rarity across different species. The question specifically asks why the rare trees survive longer. Keep that outcome in view: we need a reason those trees last longer.

Working the answers

  • A

    Being well suited to the climate could help explain why the common species thrives there. It doesn't explain the rarer species' longer survival. We need an advantage that helps account for that longevity comparison, not another reason the common species is common.

  • B

    Older trees reproducing less might connect old age with fewer offspring. But it doesn't explain why trees of rarer species reach those older ages in the first place. A fact about what happens once trees are old leaves the survival question unanswered.

  • C

    This tells us something about the study's procedure: it observed existing species rather than adding new ones. It supplies no reason rare trees would live longer than common trees. The fact that the researchers didn't introduce species doesn't explain the pattern they found.

  • D

    This describes a benefit of the rare trees surviving: their presence helps the forest recover from damage. We need to explain their survival, not what their survival accomplishes. Being useful to the forest doesn't by itself tell us how those trees manage to live longer.

  • E
    Correct

    This gives the rare trees an advantage we hadn't yet identified: less competition for the resources they need. If common trees face more competition for those resources, they may have more difficulty surviving, while rare trees can get what they need for longer. That can explain the longevity difference without requiring one particular species to be naturally longer-lived everywhere.

More Paradox questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Paradox questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.