- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 141
- Section 2, Question 10
Actor: Bertolt Brecht's plays are not genuinely successful(56 more words not shown)
The conclusion of the actor's(13 more words not shown)
- AAn audience that(14 more words not shown)
- BA character's personality(11 more words not shown)
- CThe extent to(22 more words not shown)
- DIf the personalities(25 more words not shown)
- EAll plays that,(12 more words not shown)
Reading the argument
Why can't I care about a character whose personality I don't fully understand?
The actor says Brecht's characters have such conflicting motives and beliefs that people struggle to work out their personalities. Fine. That might make the characters confusing. It doesn't yet tell us the plays fail as dramas.
The final sentence brings in a requirement for success: the audience must care what happens to at least some characters. Now I can see the intended connection, but there's still a gap. Difficulty understanding a personality isn't automatically a lack of interest in what happens to that person.
What we’re looking for
We need to make the conclusion follow. Give us a rule connecting those two ideas: if the audience can't readily work out a character's personality, it won't care about that character. Apply that to all these characters, and the play fails the stated requirement for dramatic success.
Working the answers
- ACorrect
This provides the missing connection. Audiences can't readily discern the characters' personalities, so under this rule they won't take any interest in those characters. That leaves no character whose fate the audience cares about. The plays therefore fail the requirement for success that the actor supplies.
- B
What determines a personality doesn't tell us whether an audience must understand it to care about the character. We could accept that motives and beliefs determine personality and still care about someone whose motives confuse us. The needed connection to audience interest remains missing.
- C
This adds a stronger relationship between caring and success than the premise gives: their amounts must be directly proportional. But even that rule doesn't connect confusing personalities with a lack of caring. We still don't know how much the audience cares about Brecht's characters, so C doesn't establish that these plays fail.
- D
We already know that both actors and audiences struggle to discern the personalities. A rule carrying that difficulty from actors to audiences doesn't take us any further toward lack of interest. The gap is between understanding and caring, not between the two groups' ability to understand.
- E
This tells us that other plays with sympathetic characters succeed. That doesn't show Brecht's plays fail. A play might lack empathy and still succeed by some other route under E's rule. We need to rule out success for these plays, which requires the missing connection between confusing personalities and the audience's lack of caring.
More Sufficient Assumption questions
- PrepTest 141, Section 2, Question 12Sufficient Assumption
- PrepTest 141, Section 4, Question 24Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 10, Question 1Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12, Question 4Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 13, Question 1Sufficient Assumption
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Sufficient Assumption questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.