PrepTest 114, Section 1, Question 5
Naima: The proposed new computer system, once we(60 more words not shown)
Naima and Nakai disagree with(4 more words not shown)
- Athe predicted benefits(8 more words not shown)
- Bit is essential(7 more words not shown)
- Caccomplishing the conversion(3 more words not shown)
- Dthe current computer(14 more words not shown)
- Ethe conversion to(7 more words not shown)
Reading the argument
Better is not always worth buying. Suppose a small organization with little money could get a smoother computer system only by spending a billion dollars. Even a real improvement wouldn't justify that expense. The example is deliberately extreme, but it exposes the missing question: how much does the improvement cost?
What we’re looking for
Nakai raises that concern. Naima wants the switch made as soon as possible because the new system would run better. Nakai wants to keep the existing system as long as possible because the conversion would cost more in time and money than its benefits are worth. Nakai needn't deny the improvement to oppose paying for it. For the disagreement question, I'd look for their opposing recommendations about when to make the switch.
Working the answers
- A
Nakai doesn't say the predicted benefits won't occur. The claim is that the costs outweigh them. Benefits could be fully realized and still not make the conversion worthwhile. We therefore don't have opposite positions on whether the benefits will materialize.
- B
Naima favors this proposed system, but doesn't say it is the best system available or that having the best is essential. Wanting one improvement isn't a commitment to buying the best of everything. The proposed disagreement is broader than either stated recommendation.
- C
Neither speaker says conversion is technically impossible. Nakai thinks it is too costly, which isn't the same as saying it cannot be done. Their disagreement concerns whether and when to devote resources to it.
- D
A new system working better doesn't mean the current one fails to do its job. Naima could think the current system is adequate while preferring an improvement. We aren't given opposing views about whether the old system meets its basic purpose.
- ECorrect
Naima says to accomplish the conversion as soon as possible, so Naima opposes delay. Nakai says to keep the existing system as long as possible, so Nakai favors delay. Both speakers take a clear side on this question, and their sides are opposite.
More Disagreement questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Disagreement questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.