LR Drill Set 1, Question 5

Parallel ReasoningDifficulty4 of 5
The question

All load-bearing supports are essential structural elements.(14 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(10 more words not shown)

Reading the argument

A wall that isn't essential cannot be a load-bearing support. The first sentence has already told us that every load-bearing support is essential.

That's enough to make this argument work. We know that some walls lack the required property, so those walls cannot belong to the load-bearing group. We don't need to know how many walls there are or whether other essential elements carry loads. The rule puts every load-bearing support inside the essential group; it doesn't put every essential element inside the load-bearing group.

What we’re looking for

For the parallel, I want that same movement: all members of one group have a property; some things in another group lack that property; therefore, those things aren't in the first group. The walls are the things we are checking, not the group named in the opening rule. Keep those roles straight as the subject matter changes.

Working the answers

  • A
    Correct

    Items bought at the store match load-bearing supports. Being returnable matches being essential. Pat's items match the walls. Everything bought at the store must be returnable, but some of Pat's items aren't returnable. Those particular items therefore weren't bought there. This is the same valid use of a rule: an item that lacks a required property cannot belong to the group that requires it.

  • B

    This links two rules forward. Sandstone belongs to the sedimentary group, and everything in that group was formed by deposited particles, so sandstone was formed that way. That reasoning works, but it doesn't match ours. No separate group is shown to lack the required property. To match, we would need something like: some volcanic rocks aren't sedimentary, so those rocks aren't sandstone.

  • C

    The second sentence gives us people who have the required properties, not people who lack them. Some licensed and bonded people aren't trustworthy, but those people might not be officers of this group. All the group's officers could be trustworthy while some other licensed, bonded people aren't. The original rules particular walls out of a group; C tries to transfer a fact about some members of a broader group to a narrower group.

  • D

    This rules out the wrong property first. The lace items aren't slipcovers, whereas our walls aren't essential. Knowing that something isn't a slipcover doesn't tell us it isn't protective: a blanket could protect furniture too. To match, D would need to say some lace items aren't protective and therefore aren't slipcovers.

  • E

    Some entertainment isn't worth serious attention, but all of those examples could be things other than plays. The answer never establishes that any plays belong to that disappointing group. To match the original, we would need some things worthy of attention that aren't entertainment, followed by the conclusion that those things aren't plays.

More Parallel Reasoning questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Parallel Reasoning questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.