Home › Law schools by state › Compare › Chicago-Kent College of Law vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Chicago-Kent College of Law vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Where graduates end up, what each school really costs, and who gets in, side by side from each school's official ABA data. Add your LSAT and GPA to see your chances and scholarship estimates at both.
VS
Add your numbersSee your admission chances and scholarship estimates at both schools.
The short version
- Chicago-Kent places more graduates in BigLaw or federal clerkships: 12.9% of the Class of 2025, against 6.4% at Missouri Columbia.
- Missouri Columbia costs about $38K less over three years after the average scholarship: $120K against $158K.
- Chicago-Kent is harder to get into: a 161 median LSAT and a 38.6% acceptance rate, against 161 and 42.0% at Missouri Columbia.
- Missouri Columbia has the higher first time bar pass rate: 86.2% against 79.7%.
Chicago-Kent
vs
Missouri Columbia
Where graduates go
Missouri Columbia leads 3 of 5
✓12.9%
BigLaw + federal clerkships
6.4%
✓12.5%
BigLaw (501+ attorney firms)
5.6%
0.4%
Federal clerkships
✓0.8%
84.9%
Graduates employed
✓96.8%
79.7%
First time bar passage
✓86.2%
What it costs
Chicago-Kent leads 3 of 4
$158K
Three year net cost
✓$120K
✓92%
Students receiving a scholarship
79%
✓$35,000/yr
Median scholarship (recipients)
$17,500/yr
✓$30,167/yr
Average scholarship (all students)
$12,774/yr
Who gets in
Acceptance rate: Chicago-Kent 38.6% · Missouri Columbia 42.0%
LSAT
Bars run from the 25th to the 75th percentile, with the median marked.
Chicago-Kent
156161164
Missouri Columbia
156161162
154156158160162164166
GPA
Undergraduate GPA of the entering class, same scale for both schools.
Chicago-Kent
3.453.723.89
Missouri Columbia
3.473.723.91
3.403.503.603.703.803.904.00
Chicago-Kent College of Law
University of Missouri, Columbia
More comparisons with Chicago-Kent
More comparisons with Missouri Columbia
Frequently asked questions
Is Chicago-Kent or Missouri Columbia better for BigLaw?
Chicago-Kent placed more of its Class of 2025 in BigLaw or federal clerkships: 12.9% against 6.4%. By BigLaw alone (firms of 501+ attorneys), Chicago-Kent placed 12.5% and Missouri Columbia placed 5.6%. Federal clerkships were 0.4% at Chicago-Kent and 0.8% at Missouri Columbia.
Which is harder to get into, Chicago-Kent or Missouri Columbia?
Chicago-Kent's Fall 2025 entering class had a median LSAT of 161 and a median GPA of 3.72, with a 38.6% acceptance rate. Missouri Columbia's had 161 and 3.72, with 42.0%. Add your LSAT and GPA above to see your estimated chances at both.
Which costs less, Chicago-Kent or Missouri Columbia?
After the average scholarship, three years cost about $158K at Chicago-Kent and $120K at Missouri Columbia, including living costs. Public schools are shown at out of state tuition. Your own scholarship can move these numbers a lot, so add your numbers above for an estimate.
Which gives more scholarship money, Chicago-Kent or Missouri Columbia?
92% of Chicago-Kent students receive a scholarship, with a median award of $35,000 a year among recipients. 79% of Missouri Columbia students receive a scholarship, with a median award of $17,500 a year among recipients.
Which has the better bar passage rate?
79.7% of Chicago-Kent's first time takers passed in 2025, against 86.2% at Missouri Columbia. Each school's profile shows how that compares with the states where its graduates sat.
Should I choose Chicago-Kent or Missouri Columbia?
It depends on your goals, your odds and your offers. Compare where each school's graduates end up, then add your LSAT and GPA above to see your estimated chances and scholarships at both. Your scholarship offer usually changes the cost more than anything else.
What a higher LSAT changes
Move the LSAT slider in the admissions calculator to watch your odds and scholarship estimates change at every school.
Figures come from each school’s official ABA disclosures. Admission chances and scholarship estimates are modeled from that data and are not predictions of any individual decision. Our data and methodology